I wonder if they fixed it, or if it depends on the game type. In Versus mode, I got 10/10, Jev got 7/10, but the points were closer: 1201 to 1034 so I assume time is also part of the calculation. One of mine was 9.6 seconds vs 0.3 seconds. It wasn't always clear where you were supposed to click, like on a graph, the choices were buttons at the bottom of the screen.
Its a combination of time and correct/wrong answer. But the game had not been played by these many people before so it can be that the scoring mechanism is not fully calibrated. Thanks for trying it out!
1- I got 7/10, jev got 6/10, and it says Jev won, presumably because I took 100 seconds, but Jev took 60? Funny what that reveals about author and AI-optimism in general
2- The chess board challenge isn't clear on how it should take the answer, I tried dragging a piece but that didn't work, then I tried touching the piece I wanted to move, but it marked the answer wrong, I apparently had to touch the square I needed to move the piece to.
Jev did not take 60 seconds for sure, with answers in 200-300 ms averages, more like 2 seconds.
You get very high scores if you are fast and accurate (which Jev is most of the time), and you get punished hard (15s) if you are wrong.
The game balances speed and accuracy.
Will try to improve the cards that didnt work for you, thanks for the feedback!
Very cool demo! Although I feel that incorrect answers should be penalized more. For instance- I got 100% in about 45 seconds on the sprint. Then, I clicked through as fast as I can (only limited by finding the right targets) and got a score of 42s, technically better than my first score but I only got 20% right.
Thanks for the feedback! And now that you showed everyone a cheat sheet we will get many high scores, so lets increase the penalty of wrong answers and reset the leaderboard! Thanks a lot for the insights
In my opinion the the point of the site is that Jev has knowledge on all topics that makes it hard to beat. It might not be as smart as you, but it probably has a greater breadth of knowledge.
sorry you saw it that way, was just kidding, there are many categories unlucky of him that the one he doesnt like landed on his deck
Anyway the feature he requested was literally on the app 5 minutes after he asked :)
The first one I opened only gave me a single option to press and when I pressed it the app told me I was wrong and that Jev had pressed the correct button (which was invisible to me I guess?)
I saw several other questions where I pressed the right answer and the app scored me as wrong. Broken slop.
I thought I did terrible 5, but jev got 0 in a row. then the slopcoded app says "Jev has won 2,613 of 3,300 games, this one included."
Though if you need very quick answers obviously humans can't compete.
Actually on further thought after getting 15, if you've seen the exact problem before you can answer quickly, so the usefulness is diminished to problems that don't need to be 100% correct, need to be solved very quickly (even routing might not need to be this quick), problem form often changes, but is still general knowledge, and very low marginal benifet for 99% correctness over 50%
1- I got 7/10, jev got 6/10, and it says Jev won, presumably because I took 100 seconds, but Jev took 60? Funny what that reveals about author and AI-optimism in general
2- The chess board challenge isn't clear on how it should take the answer, I tried dragging a piece but that didn't work, then I tried touching the piece I wanted to move, but it marked the answer wrong, I apparently had to touch the square I needed to move the piece to.
You get very high scores if you are fast and accurate (which Jev is most of the time), and you get punished hard (15s) if you are wrong. The game balances speed and accuracy.
Will try to improve the cards that didnt work for you, thanks for the feedback!
I saw several other questions where I pressed the right answer and the app scored me as wrong. Broken slop.
Damn.
Though if you need very quick answers obviously humans can't compete.
Actually on further thought after getting 15, if you've seen the exact problem before you can answer quickly, so the usefulness is diminished to problems that don't need to be 100% correct, need to be solved very quickly (even routing might not need to be this quick), problem form often changes, but is still general knowledge, and very low marginal benifet for 99% correctness over 50%