15 comments

  • K0balt 1 hour ago
    These are going to be so awesome to buy in 5-8 years!

    Right now I’m running 2x 3090 and 128 gb ram on 3.8 flash-next180b (the quant is 97gb) and it hums at120t/s. It’s really a surprisingly good model for general tasks, and I’m soon to see how it does with more agentic kit. For agentic work it does slow down quite a bit when the context fills up… but what do you want for running a 180b model on consumer hardware?

    Right now I have it set up as an administrator for our asterisk PBX and radius server, and it does higher level judgment on our cctv footage for notifications to security. It’s been really good so far. Agents are the new UI, everything just works over SSH now.

    • x0z 55 minutes ago
      > These are going to be so awesome to buy in 5-8 years!

      Literally my first thought!

  • hannasm 30 minutes ago
    Can intel gift me one?

    The cost of a 480gb ram video card seems preposterous to be even marketing at this point.

    Intel is going to make a card that costs $1 million dollars.. this is like industrial newsletters bleeding into a public forum

    > Commercial Scale Pricing: In the industrial data center sector, battery storage systems are priced per kilowatt-hour (kWh) or megawatt-hour (MWh). Industrial battery storage installations typically cost $300,000 to $450,000+ per MWh of capacity depending on software integration, cooling systems, and structural framing.

    Let's all get excited

  • suprjami 1 hour ago
    With an impressive 1.5TB/s RAM bandwidth you'd think they'd advertise that more.

    Marketing department asleep at the wheel.

    • auspiv 47 minutes ago
      This is a very low number for a server GPU. My V100 from 2017 is 0.9 TB/s.

      A single B300 has almost 8 TB/s.

      AMD MI300x from 2023 is 5.3 TB/s

      Edit: my bad you are saying that this is an impressive number precisely because it is more or less normal RAM, not VRAM

    • layoric 1 hour ago
      Source? Extremely impressive if true
  • ismailmaj 1 hour ago
    1.5 TB/s 1.3 PFLOPS with no fast multi-GPU, it's a consumer card that pretends to be a server card.

    It would work great on Qwen3.8-Flash-Next or GLM-5.3 as single user decode only hits a few experts, anything with concurrent users and you'd be sitting for a while.

    • minraws 32 minutes ago
      That's the point I believe fast local 2-4 user service for cheap on very large models.

      You have to pretend it's for servers to keep investors happy, it would be banks and similar with in house servers that have to run local large models buying these for experiments and cybersecurity. Likely.

  • rkagerer 3 hours ago
    Can I actually buy this? Should I prefer it over Blackwell?
    • samuelknight 2 hours ago
      You can tell by the shape of the board that it's meant to go into a server chassis behind a stack of 80mm blower fans. It's not meant for consumers, but you will be able to buy it used for $200 off ebay in 7 years to put in your home lab.
      • m463 15 minutes ago
        Wonder if today's ram will go up price by then...
    • kadoban 3 hours ago
      > Can I actually buy this?

      No. Certainly not now, maybe not ever. That is the least consumer-focused product page I've seen today.

      • legitronics 3 hours ago
        Intel ai gpu division is so aggressively anti “small” consumer. I think it has something to do with low volume and a small sales/distribution network. The data center cards I have from amd and nvidia are grey market at best. I don’t think intel moved enough units to establish alternate channels.
        • cheeze 2 hours ago
          Serious question, would they bother?

          You can work with 10 players that will buy all of them with minimal effort.

          • derefr 1 hour ago
            What I don't understand is: when you only plan for your product to have 10 customers, why even make a marketing page like this for it? At that point it's essentially the hardware equivalent of consultingware, something you sell to your existing contacts through outbound calls and by shoving ads through the B2B equivalent of a post-consumer sales channel (i.e. proactive outreach by your org's internal champion for that customer, to said customer.)
            • davrosthedalek 1 hour ago
              Because they want the hype to make the stock go up.
            • hughw 1 hour ago
              In fairness, they spent 5 cents generating it with Claude.
  • ismailmaj 1 hour ago
    Fun to see the LLMism on the product page: "A, not B"
    • hughw 1 hour ago
      Productivity!
  • nunzioraciti 35 minutes ago
    How much is it expected to cost?
  • hurricanepootis 6 hours ago
    Looks like Intel is choosing to title its new crescent island cards with the D prefix despite being Crescent Island.

    Kind of disappointed that Intel is (probably) not going to release consumer class GPUs. Intel's driver stack was seriously getting mature—both on Linux and Windows. It's always nice to have a third option available.

    • ank 44 minutes ago
      Agreed. I was really rooting for them to deliver that third iteration to consumers, and retain them as a competitive option in the low to mid range. Pretty sad to see.
    • boredatoms 1 hour ago
      Its wild to me that intel isnt trying significantly harder on gpus

      Theres so much money to be made

      • ThrowawayR2 1 hour ago
        Why make consumer margins on consumer GPUs when they could be making enterprise margins on enterprise GPUs?
        • boredatoms 48 minutes ago
          I mean, why not both
          • ThrowawayR2 37 minutes ago
            "Both" requires more engineering staff on payroll, more wafers to fab/dice/package/test, more boards to manufacture, more inventory to manage, among other things. If their math says it isn't worth it (granted that they don't always get it right), then they don't do it.
    • oddIdentities 3 hours ago
      At least that driver stack will continue to mature?
      • zakisaad 3 hours ago
        On Linux mainly, and almost strictly for compute workloads (not much need to optimize for 3D workloads given the customer base).
        • bpye 3 hours ago
          They're still using Xe based iGPUs, so 3D still matters.
          • DiabloD3 2 hours ago
            For now. A limited run of Celestials until 2028 when Serpent Lake switches to Nvidia tiles, and a bit longer for the LTS combo (AMD style) IO+GPU die in lower end/embedded products.

            Druid is still dead, consumer DGPUs are still, and workstation DGPUs also seems to be dead, and most of the Xe driver team for Windows was laid off, as well as most of the Xe chip design team.

  • arjie 2 hours ago
    Seems incredibly little compute for this. Is it meant to be MoE specific?
  • aboardRat4 2 hours ago
    How many fps in Cyberpunk 2077?
    • drnick1 1 hour ago
      Can It Run Crysis?
      • 2OEH8eoCRo0 1 hour ago
        What about Windows Vista with Aero enabled?
  • jauntywundrkind 4 hours ago
    They originally said it was going to be 120GB but that partners could ship bigger capacities. So much for that!

    I do hope this has a price point that makes it somewhat competitive with a Mac! Consumers have had nearly no choices available for mem capacity, and 20 channels of lpddr5 is one way to get that capacity! Go Intel!

    • bigyabai 3 hours ago
      Both this GPU and the Mac are constrained by a lack of GPU compute. There's basically no rack-scale GPUs with 480gb on-die that have a sub-400W compute element. It's going to be incredibly prefill-constrained on denser model inference just like the Apple Silicon iGPUs are.
      • krasin 3 hours ago
        This GPU has 1.3 PFLOPS of FP8 compute performance and 1.5 TB/s of memory bandwidth: https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-gpu-d270-is-xe3p-crescent-...

        This is almost twice better than RTX 5090. This GPU will not be prefill constrained, I feel.

        But I am surprised that they were able to pack so much flops into 300W.

        • kadoban 3 hours ago
          > But I am surprised that they were able to pack so much flops into 300W.

          I'm not. When you're doing inference you typically reduce power limits anyway if you're optimizing for efficiency. Even if you don't, it doesn't spike to the max of the card.

          My 3090 I power it down to 175W or so for single-digit reductions in performance for like, 60% of the wattage, something like that.

      • shusaku 3 hours ago
        It seems like there’s a market out there that is just happy to run the models locally, even if generation is slow.
      • jchw 2 hours ago
        Am I wrong to assume that large MoE models are likely the point anyway? Seems like this card would love DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
  • porkbellyeee 2 hours ago
    Ai generated no doubt
  • nekusar 2 hours ago
    Yay more vaporware hardware I get to read about and never see or have a chance to buy.
    • Gigachad 2 hours ago
      This stuff you usually buy second hand in 6 years when the data centers get rid of them.
  • doublerabbit 2 hours ago
    > Efficient token serving Dense, air-cooled, standard PCIe infrastructure helps maximize tokens per rack and watt, scaling serving capacity and keeping costs in check.

    Next the tokens will be asking for tequila and caviar. Bow down to the new token overloads.

  • typon 16 minutes ago
    [dead]