13 comments

  • mwalser 2 minutes ago
    It's interesting to see that the UX issues that are annoying me when using Azure DevOps are finding their way into GitHub.

    In case they are truly chasing Azure DevOps level UX, I would recommend they implement an HTML editor for issues that, depending on whether the user has dark mode or light mode enabled, saves some CSS of the respective mode and makes it unreadable if read within the other mode.

  • willio58 52 minutes ago
    It’s always been interesting to me that multi-million and even billion dollar tech companies don’t have perfect websites in terms of UX.

    Just last night I was helping my GF set up an ad for her job on LinkedIn. The UX was terrible. Like awful and basic things like save and exit were completely broken. Meanwhile LinkedIn makes what percentage of their revenue through ads? Same with google ads. It’s like these products that are in a way some of the most valuable products in the planet, are given a junior web dev and a “UX designer” who really doesn’t know anything about UX.

    • chuckadams 20 minutes ago
      I don't think there is such a thing as perfect UX and I'm not asking for it. I just want them to stop making it worse.

      Seriously tho, why isn't this something that a browser can do? Why can't I just split a tab and say all links from the left tab open in the right? Why not be able to scroll through history as a list of such panes like a smalltalk browser or file explorer on a mac? Maybe even a history tree, able to be forked with a click or two. Tree-style tabs are a baby step toward that, but I'm not seeing much interest out there in actually learning how to run.

      • xprueg 3 minutes ago
        Just in case you aren’t aware, Edge can split a tab and open links from the left side on the right.
    • Zanfa 13 minutes ago
      > It’s always been interesting to me that multi-million and even billion dollar tech companies don’t have perfect websites in terms of UX.

      This, but for online shops, especially clothing. Horrendously buggy, laggy, with broken navigation (especially when navigating back), filters that don't work on > 95% of online stores. Why they wouldn't fix their primary (or at the very least highest margin) income stream is beyond me, but I've had to abandon so many shopping carts just because the checkout flow is literally broken.

    • simonw 33 minutes ago
      UX is really, really hard - and for some reason still not fully respected as a discipline.
      • cjbgkagh 13 minutes ago
        The Win8 and Metro design disaster is what happens when you give UX free rein, instead of focusing on users they try to start design trends to impress other UX / designers (essential for their career).

        I wonder how much of Apples design was basically ‘if you confuse Steve Jobs you’re fired.’ And this acted as a necessary governing force to counteract the need to impress peers.

        • chuckadams 10 minutes ago
          Metro was a wonderful design for the media player app it was made for. It's great for menu-heavy interactions, not so much for representing stateful things like options and checkboxes and such. Metro isn't the problem, it's trying to shoehorn UIs into it regardless of fit that is.
    • rvz 9 minutes ago
      They make tens of billions, elsewhere to not even care about tiny UX issues like this.

      At this point, it will stay broken because the amount of people complaining are not paying but are a tiny amount of people that will end up continuing to live with it.

      So it won't be fixed.

  • qwertyforce 14 minutes ago
    It will probably suffer the same fate as the most-upvoted discussion of all time in the GitHub Community repo: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/66188

    no reaction

  • NooneAtAll3 3 minutes ago
    I still don't understand what's the point of any full screen popups are
  • Delgan 3 minutes ago
    Alas, GitHub has been plagued by bugs and UX regressions year after year.

    I reported a bug last year about being unable to quote code blocks. It's quite a basic yet fundamental feature, right? They acknowledged the bug and moved on. To this day, quoting a block of code is still broken [1].

    They simply don't care. I suppose their attention is focused on other subjects...

    Anyway, I kind of accepted the "enshitification" of things I used to like. Fortunately, in this case, we can still hack our way around using custom userscripts [2].

    [1] https://imgur.com/a/github-bug-cant-quote-blocks-of-code-Z9O...

    [2] https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/192665#discuss...

  • red_admiral 10 minutes ago
    There's browser extensions to bring back more user control on youtube, facebook, trello* and many others; looks like someone should make one for github soon.

    *the markdown enabler needs updating last I checked

  • HeavyStorm 17 minutes ago
    This title is misleading: yes, a bunch of users didn't liked it. But of course there's UI research and likely A/B testing showed github that this might be preferable to the majority of users.

    Personally, I don't like it much. It sounds like leakage from AzDO design. Maybe a option to turn it off would be the best way out.

    Disclaimer: I work for msft, although I've no connection to github, ado or any other such tool.

    • denverllc 2 minutes ago
      > A/B testing showed github that this might be preferable

      A/B testing can’t measure preference, only interaction.

  • mikkelam 57 minutes ago
    Just improve what you have GitHub. Stop the AI bloatware. You will lose that race anyway, obviously.
  • shevy-java 2 minutes ago
    Interesting to see that Microsoft is now also ruining the old UI. That was the only advantage GitHub would still have over Gitlab, as Gitlab's UI was always horrible. And now Microsoft nerfs GitHub here. This is epic.
  • binarybee 1 hour ago
    Links should be links. Stop making them into something else.
  • add-sub-mul-div 12 minutes ago
    Last week there was a new Plex update to their already bad new redesign where they changed the main font. And I hated it, but it also reminded me, this font may not be objectively worse than the last one so much as the regular change is what has made me come to hate using the app. We don't give enough credit to maintaining the status quo. If software was getting better and discomfort with new designs was a tax we had to pay, then fine. That was still the world of ten years ago, perhaps. Now we're deeply into the era of software getting worse. The design changes from employees who have full time permanent jobs and need to make themselves busy aren't balancing actual progress.
  • cebert 1 hour ago
    I wish they’d focus on making their platform reliable and more stable.
    • kernc 26 minutes ago
      Why would they care to empower competitors?
  • luckman212 2 hours ago
    If anyone knows someone at GitHub and can tap them on the shoulder, please ask them to revert this terrible change.
    • rvz 7 minutes ago
      Tay.ai (Microsoft's infamous chatbot) and copilot are too busy vibe coding GitHub into the ground to look at the issue. There is no CEO of GitHub anymore to respond, which means no-one cares anymore.
    • verdverm 1 hour ago
      Unfortunately GitHub, err Microsoft, stopped listening a long time ago. From the feed to text contrast to many more issues, their community feedback repo has become a place where complaints go to die.