Pixar's True Story

(computerhistory.org)

37 points | by kristianp 5 hours ago

1 comments

  • IndySun 3 hours ago
    I couldn't find the word 'Lasseter' in that post.
    • davvid 2 hours ago
      Nor Catmull, unfortunately. FWIW, the article is centered around the financing and IPO side of the story.
      • MangoToupe 5 minutes ago
        This explains today's Pixar better than any anomaly like "expertise", "talent", or "insight". Investors should never be regarded as retarded, but it's a label they should aspire to. As it stands it looks like disney enjoys heating the home by burning pixar stock.

        Zootopia 2 was pretty good tho, ngl

    • andrehacker 1 hour ago
      After the MeToo allegations, his contributions have been removed—or at least significantly downplayed—in Disney and Pixar’s accounts of Pixar’s origins.
      • dagmx 1 hour ago
        This is demonstrably not true.

        He has fairly equal representation as the other founders on their history page

        https://www.pixar.com/our-story

        He also is directly mentioned in the Disney+ docuseries on ILM, and was part of Catmul’s retrospective on Toy Story as recently as this year

        https://youtu.be/q1Uq8b2ooVk?si=zjHSHjGHtymH-kKy

        Pixar and Disney haven’t been shying away from his involvement in their history

        • andrehacker 5 minutes ago
          Hm, the fact that he was mentioned or referenced does not prove that his role was downplayed, a quick search of the interwebs shows:

          - 2018 Oscars: Despite his massive influence on Coco, none of the filmmakers mentioned him by name in their acceptance speeches for Best Animated Feature.

          - Film Premieres: Lasseter did not attend the 2018 premiere of Incredibles 2, a film he was heavily involved in, further signaling his detachment from official company events.