15 comments

  • feverzsj 51 minutes ago
    Their workers work 12 hrs a day and only get 2 days off per month. It's the worst kind of modern slavery. I don't think they can produce even qualified cars under such pressure.
  • hyruo 30 minutes ago
    The number of RORO ships is directly proportional to the volume of automobile exports. As of 2022, China had only 100 such ships, accounting for just 14% of the global fleet. However, considering that Chinese shipbuilding enterprises currently have orders for an additional 200 RORO ships, it is possible that in the future, China's share of the global roll-on/roll-off fleet could reach one-third.
  • sho_hn 1 hour ago
  • senti_sentient 1 hour ago
    Living in Australia, I chose a BYD over a Tesla. After previously owning a Nissan Leaf, I can clearly see why BYD is leading the EV market.
  • ipnon 1 hour ago
    OP clearly has an ulterior motive. Normally I wouldn't call in to question the motives of the poster themselves, but for a green account with a consistent submission history it seems fair.
    • sho_hn 35 minutes ago
      Seems like a witch hunt to me. OP's history is relatively diverse, and the comments are not lacking in content or argument. Having opinions is not a vile "ulterior motive".
    • _tik_ 1 hour ago
      what is the motive? I did not see any pattern from the op's history post
    • zfg 59 minutes ago
      You mean I'm interested in EVs and I'm unimpressed with oligarchs?

      Oh no. You caught me.

      • ipnon 53 minutes ago
        Textbook
      • lemon_zest 42 minutes ago
        Can’t be promoting Chinese companies around here. /s We are going through a rehash of the good old Red Scare.
  • Incipient 3 hours ago
    Vertically integrating. Not as subtle as I'd have expected, but still sensible.
    • creer 1 hour ago
      That's pushing vertical integration to extremes. Is there any precedent to car carriers dedicated to one manufacturer? Wikipedia mentions a "Toyota Maru No. 10" which was NOT owned by Toyota - although I don't know if it was dedicated to them.
      • markrages 51 minutes ago
        > Is there any precedent to car carriers dedicated to one manufacturer?

        General Motors helped design the Vert-A-Pac. https://chevyvega.fandom.com/wiki/Vert-A-Pac

        • creer 31 minutes ago
          Cool engineering, thank you.
      • sho_hn 51 minutes ago
        https://www.maritimegateway.com/volkswagen-group-orders-lng-...

        These are also not owned by VW Logistics, but on long-term lease to them.

        Note this is the similar for several BYD RoRo carriers, e.g. the BYD Explorer No.1 and BYD Changzhou are owned by Zodiac Maritime and chartered by/leased to BYD.

        As to why a UK-based shipping company owned by a Israeli billionaire based in Monaco buys RoRo carriers from a Chinese shipyard, and then leases them back to a Chinese car maker, I don't know. But I'm also quite curious about the regulatory and financing-related incentives and money flows involved. I'm aware this kind of setup is called a "Non-operating owner" and is fairly common.

        • creer 31 minutes ago
          Okay fair enough thank you. The article points at just Volkswagen running 9 car carriers just for the north atlantic.

          And BYD have been at it for a while, so time for a wholly owned one I guess.

          > As to why a UK-based shipping company owned by a Israeli billionaire based in Monaco buys RoRo carriers from a Chinese shipyard, and then leases them back to a Chinese car maker, I don't know.

          That's good. No idea if that's the reason, but that would be an easy way to invest in BYD while mostly not being subject to Chinese direct investing legal requirements and problems.

  • metadat 3 hours ago
    Why does the Heifei look like 1/3 of a cruise liner? What happened to the badonk tail end?

    https://electrek.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/01/BYD-W...

    To be fair, it's pretty large. If you zoom in, you can see some people in a door near the middle of the image, and they're nearly microscopic.

    • toomuchtodo 3 hours ago
      https://youtu.be/ovZyGAhde4s

      Edit: link updated with alternate documentary video without AI content, please reply with a better video if you find one on roros.

      • SahAssar 3 hours ago
        That feels very AI-generated and not in a good way.
    • Element_ 3 hours ago
      The back 1/4 of the ship is angled at for a ramp that flips down for unloading. It makes the ship look narrower from the angle the photo was taken.
    • numpad0 3 hours ago
      RORO car carriers aren't novel concept at all...
  • bilsbie 2 hours ago
    GOOD Point by my wife. Could they double purpose these ships as ferries? Seems like the same basic concept.
    • jampa 1 hour ago
      I think there are no climate controls to cool/heat the air to acceptable human levels inside the parking area. I remember seeing on the local news that the inside of the ship looked like a tightly packed parking lot, which seemed to be done by machinery to maximize occupancy.

      Here is the only photo I could find: https://movimentoeconomico.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2024/05...

    • wongarsu 1 hour ago
      It's not well advertised, but you can book voyages on many cargo ships. They just give you one of the crew cabins and pack some more food. Expect to be the only passenger.

      There are some issues though. It's slow (slower than an ocean liner since ships are more efficient at low speeds). And it's a cargo vessel, so the cargo sets the schedule. If there's an issue with the cargo that delays the ship by three weeks, you journey is delayed by three weeks. There also just isn't much happening. You have a room, a mess hall, a crew of maybe half a dozen to a dozen people to talk to, a ship to walk around on, and not much else.

      It's more of a "the journey is the destination" thing. Accordingly there are a couple youtube channels documenting such journeys

    • byw 2 hours ago
      Probably not enough space for people. Often people aren't allowed to stay in their cars.
  • philwelch 2 hours ago
    This ship might not be for peacefully exporting electric cars. China is making unmistakable preparations to invade Taiwan in the near future and RORO carrier vessels have clear military applications in such a scenario.

    Consider this analysis of the invasion barges they’re preparing: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Klkpk_hO4FQ

    • numpad0 24 minutes ago
      Car shipping RORO vessels aren't LSTs... They can't beach and land tanks. Amphibian tanks can roll on and off amphibious assault ships, but this isn't it.
    • abrookewood 1 hour ago
      That is a very good observation and a really interesting video.
      • philwelch 1 hour ago
        Yeah, I watched the video the other day and when I saw the phrase “world’s largest car carrier” I instantly thought of the photo of all of the Chinese tanks loaded onto a RORO. And this ship is even bigger? Hmmmmm…
  • vachina 48 minutes ago
    This comment section serves as a reminder that the audience is primarily American. Fragile Americans at that.
  • dukeofdoom 2 hours ago
    After the Ticktock ban and surge of Rednote installs, more people are seeing these cars here. And they look amazing for the price. The ban is backfiring spectacularly. And this is just one way.
  • just_steve_h 3 hours ago
    Ten thousand EV batteries packed into a ship’s hull.

    What could go wrong?

    • fastball 2 hours ago
      I actually assumed that was part of the impetus for creating their own ship – standard cargo ships probably aren't well-suited to the job and simultaneously are a bit concerned about transporting such cargo.
      • wongarsu 1 hour ago
        Specialized car carriers are fairly common. Maybe they added some changes to make this one especially well suited for EVs, like modified fire suppression systems. But it may well be a standard ro-ro ship with an LNG engine.
    • thehappypm 1 hour ago
      Realistically, what is the concern for EV batteries? They already make up a pretty substantial amount of market chair in the US, and yet I don’t hear stories about EV’s being more dangerous or more prone to fires or anything. The only time you ever really see an EV burning is one that was in an accident, and guess what, gas cars also blow up when they’re in an accident sometimes
    • dtgriscom 2 hours ago
      • loeg 2 hours ago
        Salt water spray is not great for vehicles in general, even ignoring batteries. Wonder what the heck they were thinking.
    • bilsbie 2 hours ago
      It would be cool to pull charge off the batteries to power the ship.
      • richardw 2 hours ago
        It seems to already use some batteries, but not sure for what:

        “the new ship includes BYD box-type battery packs and shaft-belt generators for the first time”

      • fastball 2 hours ago
        The ship runs on LNG, which is probably cleaner than charging the cars in China and using that for energy, given China's grid mix.
      • jeffbee 2 hours ago
        I estimate that all those batteries would get that ship at most 20% of the way across the Pacific.
    • wongarsu 1 hour ago
      In terms of fire risk, ten thousand gasoline cars are worse. And they have to be fueled because the cars are driven in and out of the carrier.

      EV fires are harder to put out, but in every other way this isn't different from any other car carrier

    • patatero 2 hours ago
      You could say the same thing about a refined fuel tanker.
  • ggm 2 hours ago
    I'm just here to say electrek's continuous scroll both delights and annoys me by equal measures (because of my right click new tab habit)

    This is a giant RoRo. Compared to the one I used to cross the St Lawrence River a few years back, you could pack hundreds of them inside this in a meta meta car carrier.

  • HEaFaj 1 hour ago
    So Internet apps are banned but data collection devices like electric vehicles are permitted. BYD of course has a privacy policy, but who knows what is actually collected. The same applies to other EV manufacturers.

    I suppose one can only buy 30 year old second hand vehicles.